Reuters journalist spoke with three anonymous sources regarding the decision of the European Commission, which is studying the merger transaction Microsoft And Activision Blizzard. The regulator will probably approve the absorption due Nintendo And NVIDIA.
Purchase Microsoft All assets of Actiblizz for $ 68.7 billion cannot take place without the approval of the US commissions, the European Union, Great Britain and a number of other states. According to Reuters, already on April 25, the case will move off the ground. The European Commission may be one of the first major regulators to approve the deal.
Microsoft concluded 10-year agreements with Nintendo And NVIDIA, Having promised to distribute games on their platforms without delay and temporary exclusivity in case of success of the absorption of Actiblizz. Such a step should dispel one of the main fears of many regulators – the monopolization of the market and such large franchises as Call of Duty.
Reuters also reported that the European Commission would not require a partial purchase of Actiblizz. A similar proposal was previously received from the regulator in the UK.
March 2, 2023 Dialogs and rollerbags under The Offspring – Road 96: Mile 0
March 3, 2023 Green-legged Elves-Warvars in the preview Age of Wonders 4
The best comments
So I did not understand:
1) only the activist Blizard has large games?
2) If one of the competitors "begin to buy less", then T -shirts automatically become monopolists? And less like? Let’s say about 30 by 70 in favor of Sony now. And if it becomes 40 by 60 in favor of Sonya, then Mikov can already begin to be considered monopolists, because the consoles Sony began to buy less? And what where is Nintendo in this story?
3) So once now, if the box is bought less, then Sony’s monopoly? Or the term monopoly means something like: "The presence of exclusions is not in Sonya"?
It seems to me that the gaming industry is holding on not one code. And if it does not become a monopoly? And if Sony strangizes the Hbox and becomes a monopoly? And indeed, what a monopoly line. Mikes buy Sonya, thereby removing their competitor – this is a monopoly. Activist is not a competitor T -shirt. By acquiring an activist, they strengthen (whether they enhance?) their competitiveness.
Well, all the stories with the exam are Sonya, all payments to the studios for exclusivity, temporary exclusivity, exclusive content do not help Sonya become monopolists? Well, if now the approximate ratio on stationary consoles of 70 by 30 in favor of Sonya, who are closer to the monopoly?
The difference is that T -shirts buy a developer, and Sonya just spends less, buying individual games. And the result is the same – exclusive. And then, in case the shirts still take the sorcerer, which does not yet look rational for them.
How she will become a monopolist? To do this, you need to buy up all major publishers, at least making games in a certain genre.
Seriously? And what do https://avengers80casino.co.uk/bonus/ you mean by the monopoly? In the market of stationary consoles, in fact, 2 devices (Nintendo has a different niche). One device remains – a monopoly appears in this niche.
The first phrase – generalization. But of course, you can find fault with him. Let’s take a nap. According to your opinion, buying code (namely it, not activist-slizard. Everything is clear that Sony does not bother the blitches, not King) can make MIKIKOV as monopolists. T.e. One series is so great that I can generalize that "the whole industry is holding on it".
Next is an example of a monopoly in a single niche. Where is the contradiction?
I give a tooth that he understands the console market
Then it turns out that Sonya is a monopolist, she has 70% of the market.
President Maykov said about 70% of Sonya that people pulled out of context and ridiculed. In fact, this is without taking into account Big N, which is cooked in its niche there.
Oh, schizoid in the comments!
Where is Sonya 70% of the market? The news was from analysts, where they had 45%.
And then the code, the only AAA annual, selling multimillion -dollar circulations. The rest were sprinkled or very rarely done. This is not counting that Mikes have more studios.
What kind of nonsense did I just read? The code is far from the only AAA that is annually sold by million circulations. There is FIFA, Madden. I do not like athletes, there is GTA 5, which is sold annually more than many major releases for all the time. And outside the slave of one series, but within the framework of one type, Sonya annually produces the same coarse -budget action from 3 persons sold millions. I’m not talking about millions of sales of Nintendo games.
Jimbo don’t get out of binge, here is bad news for you.
N is generally cunning devils, due to the fact that there are no competitors in the niche, they can spin there as you like.
Monopoly on aaa loners is a monopoly
So I tried to understand the logic of the author of this comment:
Naturally approve – where are they, damn it!
It was just necessary to make more noise on this approval. Well, the Americans most likely wait for them to be given on their paw.
Anglo-Saxons are now completely out of work because of his turn against Brexit. They like puppies go where the majority goes.
A market structure in which a large percentage of the market belongs to one player. In this case, there may be small players.
I answered the rest above.
If you consider the industry only large -budget single games, then yes, Sonya buy T -shirts, thereby removing their competitor – this is a monopoly. Although the same Nintendo with its most popular console remains. And then the code, the only AAA annual, selling multimillion -dollar circulations. The rest were sprinkled or very rarely done. This is not counting that Mikes have more studios.
I thought that Sony would buy Blizz, maybe I was mistaken looking at this news.
Interestingly, if Microsoft becomes a monopolist, then the responsible will be punished?
Two sentences contradict each other. What do you mean by the game industry?
I’m not saying that it will immediately become. I say that it will get an advantage that will help them become monopolists.
